Logique et Analyse

We publish research in logic, philosophy of logic and/or mathematics, argumentation theory, and analytic philosophy, broadly conceived.

We welcome submission of papers in English, French, German or Dutch, with an approximate length of 15 to 20 pages. Occasionally, longer pieces of exceptional significance are considered as well.

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines:

• The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
• The submission file is a pdf-file.
• The following minimal formatting requirements are met:
  • The manuscript has a title.
  • The manuscript has an abstract.
  • The pages are numbered.
  • The bibliography appears at the end of the manuscript.
• If submitting a manuscript for double-blind review, do make sure that identifying information was removed from the manuscript itself as well as from the document properties.

Following an initial vetting by the editorial board, each submission is evaluated by one or two external referees. Depending on whether the author identity is clear from the manuscript, a double-blind or single blind peer review procedure will be followed.

Review procedure: Double-blind

• Identity transparency: Double anonymized: Reviewer identity is not made visible to author, author identity is not made visible to reviewer, reviewer and author identity is visible to (decision-making) editor
• Reviewer interacts with: Editor: Communication between editor and reviewer (traditional model). Also known as 'independent review'. Identities can be anonymized or visible.
• Review information published: None.

Review procedure: Single-blind

• Identity transparency: Single anonymized: Reviewer identity is not made visible to author, author identity is visible to reviewer, reviewer and author identity is visible to (decision-making) editor
• Reviewer interacts with: Editor: Communication between editor and reviewer (traditional model). Also known as 'independent review'. Identities can be anonymized or visible.
• Review information published: None.

(We use the terminology of the NISO/STM's Working Group on Peer Review Terminology.)

If the submission is accepted for publication, the author or authors have to send the source file to the editors via e-mail. If the source file is a TeX-file, then the authors have to use the LaTeX template. If the double-blind peer review procedure was followed, the author or authors have to add their name(s), affiliation(s) and e-mail address (of the corresponding author).

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

• Authors are permitted to deposit the accepted versions of their manuscripts (with peer review but without the publisher's layout) in institutional and subject repositories, e.g. PhilArchive or PhilSci Archive, or to post them on their personal websites. There is no embargo period for the accepted versions.
• Authors grant the publisher right of first publication (paper and online on the publisher's and journal's website).
• Authors are permitted to post the published versions of their manuscripts after an embargo period, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

The names and email addresses collected by the journal will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of te journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.